Why we won’t accept AI generated writing
It has been our experience that AI writing is subpar to human-written work. AI sentences are filled with fluffy nonsense that really doesn’t say anything at all, but uses an awful lot of words to do it.
If you are a writer who feels an AI generated version of your story is better than what you can actually write yourself, your writing will never improve. The key things holding new writers back are a weak grasp on grammar and a solid understanding of plot and structure. All this can be learned from books. Heck, we don’t even care if you have your dearest AI recommend the books you can learn this from!
If you have a passion for writing, then learn everything you can about plot, character arcs, and structure. Write poorly a million times before you write well. Yes, this will take time, but your brain creates the pathways to maintain your new writing habits over this time. This is something you will never gain from AI.
Books that have been generated with artificial intelligence are boring. They are repetitious, predictable, and empty. There are millions of them now out in the marketplace and none of them are original, despite what your closest AI has told you. When a reader picks up your book, don’t settle for them getting bored because it feels like your book is just like everyone else’s.
Besides poor quality and reader experience, AI generative works cannot be copyrighted. Even if this aspect of the situation changes in the future, we still do not want ai-generated books.
The bottom line
We will not accept AI-generated manuscripts.